The Myth of the Virgin Birth and Its Allegory Explained

Scene from the Temple of Luxor at ancient Thebes in Egypt, built by Amenhotep III

In the age-old tale of a virgin conceiving a child, lies a captivating allegory transcending popular theology. The Bible (originally Genesis to Malachi) doesn’t talk about or support a miraculous virgin birth. It talks about a profound journey of mental conception through acquiring wisdom. I’ve actually detailed this subject in a presentation.

The origin for the virgin birth is clearly stated, in four separate scenes, within the temple of Luxor built by Amenhotep III, a Pharaoh of the eighteenth dynasty. I will quote a passage from Gerald Massey’s book to give you an idea of what this scene depicts:

“The first scene on the left hand shows the god Talit, the lunar Mercury, the divine Word or Logos. in the act of hailing the virgin queen, announcing to her that she is to give birth to the coming son.

“In the next scene the god Kneph (in conjunction with Hathor) gives life to her. This is the Holy Ghost or Spirit that causes conception; Kneph being the spirit. Impregnation and conception are made apparent in the virgin's fuller form.

“Next the mother is seated on the midwife's stool, and the child is supported in the hands of one of the nurses.

“The fourth scene is that of the adoration. Here the child is enthroned, receiving homage from the gods and gifts from men. Behind the deity Kneph, on the right three men are kneeling and offering gifts with the right hand and life with the left. The child thus announced, incarnated, born, and worshipped was the Pharaonic representative of the Aten sun, the Adon of Syria, and Hebrew Adonai, the child-Christ of the Aten cult, the miraculous conception of the ever-virgin mother personated by Mut-em-Ua.” Massey, G. (1886). The historical Jesus and the mythical Christ, or, Natural genesis and typology of equinoctial Christolatry. (32/33)

In Egypt, before a Pharaoh would impregnate his wife, he would leave the bedroom and go into a secret room. He would wash in “holy water” and anoint his entire body with “holy oil.” After doing so, he would exit this secret chamber, return to his wife, and have intercourse with her.

Pharaoh does this routine because, by washing and anointing himself in the “holy ordinance,” his body becomes a “vessel for God.” “God” now inhabits his body. The seed shooting out of him and into his wife becomes the “seed of God,” hence the wife of Pharaoh is impregnated by “God” and “their child” immaculately conceived. This is the scene depicted at Luxor. The tradition of this mythology was inevitably passed down and adopted by the writers of the gospels.

The Bible doesn’t discuss such a concept of birth, but rather highlights a birth as found in the saying, "That which is born of the Spirit is spirit" (Jn.3:6). This is a concept transcending realms of superstition and religion, representing a deep union of the mind with the scriptures and with its self. The Dawn of Devotion tackles the Bible’s concept of birth, further answering the question: “What exactly does it mean for a ‘virgin’ to ‘conceive’?”

The issue of birth and of conception are issues having to do with the growth and the development of the mind. Only by introducing acquired wisdom and understanding into the mind can one know the intended “birth.” The child of the “Holy Ghost” isn't a mythological product. These terms need to be understood in their philosophical context to grasp the learning experience our belief should have.

Terms mean much to the narrative within the Bible, and concerning this particular subject, The Dawn of Devotion, calling the Bible into action, makes sense of them. Through its narrative, we're invited, as we look at not the experience of the fiction character called “Jesus,” but at the real man, to ponder the nature of mental conception. What is learned is that true understanding emanates from the heart of the mind. The folklore written within Matthew and Luke is supposed to assist their readers in understanding the allegory therein.

Jesus: The Son of Joseph or The Son of David?

With my book, The Dawn of Devotion, hitting shelves this week, I am still wanting to touch on certain subjects that it brings out. The Bible is full of wisdom, where every verse holds layers of meaning waiting to be uncovered. One such puzzle lies in the relationship between Jesus and Joseph, as highlighted in the book of Luke. It is here that we will look into this intriguing narrative, shedding light on how the Bible, above mere biological ties, emphasizes deeper philosophical and spiritual bonds between individuals.

Deciphering “Son” and “Father” in Biblical Context

The Bible often employs symbolic language, inviting readers to look beyond surface meanings to find the reality. In Luke, Jesus is described as being the “supposed” son of Joseph, and yet David is later referred to as his “father.” This weird situation sparks a journey of understanding, where “son” and “father” transcend their literal definitions.

Philosophical Bonds Over Biological Ties

Within the Bible, “son” and “father” often symbolize spiritual relationships rather than biological ones. The scriptures speak of individuals as a "son in the faith" (1 Tim. 1:2), emphasizing a mentorship or stewardship dynamic rather than a blood connection. Again, the wife of Isaac, Rebekah, was also told that the two sons within her shouldn’t honestly be thought of as literal boys, but as denominations. This sheds light on the nuanced nature of familial terminology within the Bible .

Adam as a Precedent

The genealogy presented in Luke traces Jesus' lineage back to Adam, the first man. Adam, created from the dust of the earth and infused with a certain breath, serves as a precedent for biblical “sons” who represent spiritual successors rather than direct descendants. This spiritual lineage underscores the profound connection between what is human and what is devotional.

The Breath of God and Spiritual Activation

Adam, as the first son of God, received a certain breath that animated his being. However, his failure highlighted the need for a deeper spiritual connection beyond mere existence. The Bible teaches that true strength comes from being strengthened within the inner man, emphasizing the importance of spiritual enlightenment for true vitality. It is in Ephesians where the counsel to be strengthened with Spirit, with even the same Spirit that animated that Adam, within the inner man is given. If it is the inner man that is to awaken, this again allows us to know that Adam’s sonship wasn’t literal, but philosophical, making him not the first “man,” but rather the first “mind.”

Jesus, the Chief Apostle

In contrast to Adam, Jesus is heralded as the living God's chief apostle, imbued with that same transcendent and omnipotent breath. His words emphasize the transformative power of spiritual enlightenment, offering a path to wellbeing beyond natural or routine religious confines. Jesus' designation as the Holy Ghost’s “child” does not highlight his origin as being otherworldly, but highlights his mind as being aligned with what is inwardly well.

Creation of a Clean Heart

The cleansing and renewal of the devotional conversation’s heart is the Bible’s central theme. The psalm, "Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me” (Psalm 51:10), underscores the transformative power of the Bible’s words, leading to spiritual renewal and enlightenment.

David's Lineage and Spiritual Legacy

Jesus' connection to David extends beyond biological lineage to embody a spiritual inheritance of understanding. The saying, that Jesus should be of the "house of David," symbolizes a philosophical lineage passed down through generations, ultimately culminating in continual spiritual culture.

A Wise Continuation

From Adam to the prophets, the blessing and commandment of the scriptures have been passed down through faithful individuals, culminating in Jesus as the highlighted messenger of what has been passed down. His ministry embodied the wisdom and teachings of his spiritual predecessors.

Building the Inner Temple

The wisdom that was passed down to the real Jesus focused on building the inner devotional temple, where the Bible’s wisdom should reside. Hearers are advised to honor the Creator from out of the spirit of their mind, undergoing spiritual renewal and transformation through diligently studying and applying what is retained.

Conclusion: Embracing the Divine Name

The topic of the meaning of the terms “son” and “father,” in relation to the nature of Jesus, is a complex and intricate subject that Dawn of Devotion covers. Sonship and lineage ultimately transcend biological ties to refer to a relationship similar to one mentally or spiritually being the product of another. Joseph wasn’t the literal father of Jesus, but was his religious father. David wasn’t the literal father of Jesus, but because Jesus adopted the philosophical mindset of David, David became his father in thought, in act, and in feeling. By understanding how the Bible speaks, we can easily follow the Bible’s narrative, being able to better align our learning experience with its intention.

I have a powerpoint presentation on understanding the nature of Jesus’ life and birth.

The Spiritual Depths of Jesus' Narrative : A Philosophical Allegory for Devotional Evolution

In my upcoming book, The Dawn of Devotion: A Sacrifice for Devotional Evolution, the reader is brought face to face, in a philosophical way, with the main character of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The book’s task is to present the reader with what popular theology, through various religious theories, hides: that the Jesus character is not meant to be taken as a literal person or figure, but as an allegory educating on what an intelligent devotional conversation looks like.

The allegory that the Jesus character represents is one ultimately decoding the Bible’s terminology for profound revelations about accessing and maintaining high devotional consciousness. The context and the language of the Bible matters. When looking at how the authors of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John write, it is clear that their tone is not one of reality, but is rather one of allegory, and if reading their work correctly, the idea of how to carry personal belief, as it is intended to be understood through their main character, will manifest.

In exploring spirituality within the Jesus narrative, certain verses stand out for their profound complexity and rich symbolism. An issue that The Dawn of Devotion tackles is the issue of the Jesus character as “I Am,” where Jesus declares, in John 8:58, "Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am." This statement, at first glance, appears quite mysterious, inviting deeper contemplation and interpretation within its spiritual context.

The Bible teaches that spiritual truths are not always evident on the surface but require discernment through spiritual understanding. Jesus's statement about Abraham transcends mere chronological existence; it points to a deeper spiritual rationale beyond traditional theological constraints. However, the response of the Jews to Jesus's declaration reveals their inability to grasp its ideal spiritual significance.

Their insistence on interpreting Jesus's words literally blinded them to his message. The Jesus character said what he said because his devotional character aligned with the character at the core of the scriptures. In no way was he saying that he literally shared a timeless existence with their Deity. The context of his language distinguished between two philosophical approaches: one can either maintain a religion by continual faith in circumcision, as is exemplified by Abraham, or one can maintain an experience that existed before the Abraham experience, which is an experience harping back to creation, being one that is wholly dedicated to the development and organization of mind.

What is covered in esoteric lore is a foundational philosophical testimony of one’s experience with the words of the scriptures. Both “Abraham” and “I AM” represent two devotional experiences. Abraham represents an experience where the body is bogged down by religious routine, and by exercising “faith” in those routines. The “I AM” experience is one where the belief is becoming intelligent from exercising retained wisdom from the scriptures. I explain the subject of what “I Am” represents, and in mindful detail, on my YouTube Channel.

It is because the conscience of his belief meshed with the words of the scriptures that his mind shared in the limitless scope of their science. The Bible does not promote the religious theory of “eternal life.” The Bible teaches that the words of the scriptures add a long life to our devotional understanding (Proverbs 3:1,2). It is our mind, as we are presently alive, that is to receive the benefit of never “dying”; not the being within the human or anything that is believed to be connected to it. A naturally limited theological mind hindered the Jews from comprehending what he was saying.

Deciphering scriptural language is essential for unlocking its deeper meanings. The Dawn of Devotion tells the story of how language transforms Jesus into an instrument created to define a mindful devotional experience. His dialogue with the Jews revolves around doctrinal understanding rather than a literal or esoteric interpretation. Abraham figuratively represents the symbol of a constraining religious experience yet to be fully realized. This conveys a message of the importance of faith and obedience within physical religious rituals, which is, to the mind at the core of the Bible, very unsound and irrational.

True circumcision, as is taught through the Jesus character, is inward and mental, demanding faith in learned principles rather than adherence to outward practices. Abraham's obedience to God's voice serves as a model for spiritual growth and transformation, leading to alignment with every commandment for spiritual renewal, yet to constrain that obedience to a religious routine sort of cancels out the experiment by faith. Why? Because the concept of faith doesn’t exist within the philosophy of the religious law (Gal. 3:12).

“I AM” is a philosophical devotional experience that the man Jesus knew and practiced. This man figuratively represents an experience where devotional growth occurs not through the stimulation of the body, but through a mindful experience. When our belief can also safely exist without religious routine, theory, and law, we too will be able to say that before our denominational theory was, or before our religious opinion was, we have become doers of “I AM” to possess a health devotional character and discipline.

Understanding the significance of the statement, "Before Abraham was, I am," requires a spiritual perspective that transcends popular theological limitations. This is not a statement having historical or esoteric precedence, but rather a profound declaration of the authority of “experience” above “religion,” inviting observers to look deeper into the Bible’s philosophical nature and embrace a deeper connection with the living Mind inspiring them.

I have also covered what it means to awaken the body of our belief and to navigate the Bible’s philosophy for growth on my Youtube channel.